Milligan granted re-accreditation status by SACS


Paige Wassel,

Managing Editor

 

A three-year process of self-evaluation recently ended for Milligan when the Commission on Colleges of the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS) reaffirmed the accreditation status of the college for another ten years.

“It was a positive affirmation of Milligan’s academic strength,” said Mark Matson, academic dean.

Matson and President Don Jeanes attended the December SACS meeting which was held from Dec. 7 to 10, in which the Commission on Colleges reviewed the accreditation status of several institutions. In most cases, the Commission on Colleges either granted the accreditation status to these colleges or put colleges on a probationary/warning status. Their final decision, in Milligan’s case, was announced on Dec. 10.

The Executive Council of the Commission on Colleges made these determinations after reviewing the report of a SACS visiting committee and the college’s response to the visiting committee’s findings.

According to the Commission on Colleges’ Web page, “Accreditation of an institution by the Commission on Colleges signifies the institution has a purpose appropriate to higher education and has resources, programs and services sufficient to accomplish that purpose on a continuing basis.”

Milligan received two commendations by the SACS visiting committee and only twelve recommendations. Pat Magness, chair of the self-study steering committee, professor of humanities and English and director of humanities, said when the commendations and recommendations were made that this was an excellent response from the visiting committee, considering 25 to 30 recommendations is considered very good.

SACS recommendations 9 and 10 called for increased funding for library resources as well as additional space for the library, which agreed with the recommendations made by Milligan’s self-study report.

  Matson said Milligan would take action on these recommendations in stages, addressing the space problem “as soon as possible.” He said that movable shelves will be put downstairs and some of the seminar rooms might be opened up to provide more study space.

According to Milligan’s response to the recommendations, additional space will be acquired when the Campus Center is built and the president’s office and the information technology department are removed from the library. Further expansion of the library will take top priority in the next capital campaign, which should begin in 2007.

In the report Milligan responded, “An expansion might be possible by 2010 or shortly thereafter.”

Magness said that preparation for the next SACS review should begin around 2010, and she said that SACS had changed the process of accreditation so that it should be simpler than this time.

“They have greatly reduced the number of criteria,” Magness said.

In place of an extensive list of criteria, Magness said the Commission on Colleges established principles of accreditation for the college to follow, but more emphasis is placed on the college developing its own goals.

“The college should devote most of its energy now to what they call a quality enhancement plan,” Magness said.

This plan is descibed on the website, “Engaging the wider academic community and addressing an issue or issues that contribute to institutional improvement, the plan should be focused, succinct, and limited in length.”