Christian Attitudes Toward Violence and Non-Violence

 

        Following the way of Jesus has never been easy, but few matters of Christian discipleship are more difficult and agonizing to sort through than those concerning violence.  The following links are intended both to inform Christians regarding aspects of their heritage of which they may be unaware and to encourage thoughtful and prayerful reflection as Christians seek to discern together how the body of Christ is called to live in the world as a witness to God's ultimate purposes.

        Although it is difficult to discern what most "typical" people are thinking and feeling in the days following the tragic events of September 11, here are two responses that likely resonate with many, many people.

        Time Magazine: The Case for Rage and Retribution

        Michael Kelly: "The Trouble with Pacifism"

        Sentiments such as these are not only widespread, but they are also entirely understandable. Yet Christians must still face squarely the difficult matter of whether and to what extent being a follower of Jesus requires a willingness to lay down tools of violence and seek grace-enabled ways of responding to violence that bear embodied witness to God's new creation in Jesus Christ.  
        Such questions are crucial in the present situation, not least because most of the current references to "pacifism" (from the Latin word for "peace") automatically (but wrongly) equate it with "passivism" (doing nothing).  But Jesus never calls us to "do nothing" in the face of evil; rather, he calls us to do the more difficult thing, the thing that we can only do if God empowers us with divine grace and strength, which is reach out to our enemies and love them as God loved God's own enemies.  The so-called "peace churches" in the United States are still trying to bear witness to this possibility in the current context, even though they admit that it is very difficult to do so. (By the way, many people in the Christian Churches/Churches of Christ do not realize that their churches, like most "restorationist" movements, were advocates of non-violence in their earliest days and were considered by many to be part of the "peace churches."  For example, see Craig M. Watts' excellent collection of essays, Disciple of Peace: Alexander Campbell on Pacifism, Violence and the State.)
        One obvious barrier to considering this possibility seriously is that we too often assume (if not insist) that the world can be neatly divided between the just and the unjust, the civilized and the barbarians, the good and the evil people, and it's likewise clear which side all of us are on.  For example, I find it difficult to imagine what it might mean to reach out in love to "them" because I assume that they are so entirely different from me and from you, so utterly and unimaginably wicked. Yet we might question whether this widely-assumed story is consonant with the truth that God tells us about ourselves in Scripture, in Jesus Christ, and especially in and through the cross. Here, the recent reflections by Jim Forest might helpfully remind us of a crucial part of our Christian self-understanding that we dare not forget.  The first, "We Have Met the Enemy and He is Us," was delivered in June 2001; the second, "September 11 and the Reverence for Life," in November of 2001.  In a similar vein, Christians must in humility approach this recent crisis with an honest willingness to explore the connections between global injustice and terrorism.  Such an exploration in no way excuses terrorism (anymore than the recognition that the injustices created by the Treaty of Versailles contributed to Hitler's rise excuses his reign of terror), but it might keep us from too conveniently assuming that the only injustices that need to be addressed are those perpetrated by terrorists and the countries that harbor them.  Along this line, we might do well to reflect on the essays by Rabbi Michael Lerner ("A World Out of Touch With Itself: Where the Violence Comes From") and David Clark of The Guardian ("To Explain Is Not to Excuse"), as well as a recent essay in the Charlotte Observer by a local pastor ("I am against this war").  We might also do well as Christians to listen to some of our brothers and sisters around the world who often see these matters in a different light.  For example, Vinoth Ramachandra, who is the IFES Regional Secretary for South Asia (IFES is InterVarsity Christian Fellowship's sister organization in other countries), has written An Open Letter to American Students and the American Church.  Likewise, Peter Storey, a theologian from South Africa, penned a very powerful letter to his friends in the United States two days after the events of September 11.
        Another significant barrier is that many Christians have not reflected theologically as deeply about violence and its necessity as they have other forms of temptation and sin (such as sexual sin.)  The result is that the views of many Christians about violence reflect primarily their formation as citizens of a culture steeped in violence and its portrayals in the media.  In other words, because every culture instills a sense of what is "possible" and "realistic," most of us find the words of Jesus about non-violence and love for enemies to be "impossible," "idealistic," and therefore "unrealistic."  But what does such a judgment say about our view of God?  Are we actually willing to admit that Jesus commands us to love our enemies but that it isn't possible?  Does Jesus ever command us to do anything that he doesn't also promise to empower us to do?  Perhaps what we need most is a transformed imagination, an imagination that does not too quickly assume that what Jesus instructs us to do cannot be done.
        One place to begin having one's imagination transformed is to familiarize oneself with those parts of the Christian tradition that have consistently tried to take seriously Jesus' teachings about love of enemies. The amount of the material available about Christian non-violence and love of enemies on the Internet is voluminous.  If you are interested in learning more, here are a few places to begin:
       
        Overview of Pacifism and Biblical Nonresistance (J.C. Wenger)

        "Blessed Are the Meek: The Roots of Christian Non-Violence" (Thomas Merton)

        Overview of the Christian "Just-War" Tradition

       These represent, of course, just the tip of the proverbial iceberg.  For those interested in pursuing the matter further, you might visited one or more of the following web sites hosted by Christian and interfaith groups committed to educating people in the way of peacemaking.

        Fellowship of Reconciliation

        Baptist Peace Fellowship of North America

        Sojourners

        Pax Christi USA

        Episcopal Peace Fellowship

        Lutheran Peace Fellowship

        Orthodox Peace Fellowship

        Mennonite Church Peace and Justice Committee

        Writings on Christian Nonresistance and Pacifism from Anabaptist-Mennonite Sources

 

Return to Christ and Culture Syllabus | Return to Christ and Culture Links | Return to Kenneson Home Page

Last updated: 03/06/08